Instruments / Ensign
Demonstration version · the deployed Ensign is built for your environment
A label doesn't rescue a claim that's misleading regardless.
Six scenarios test whether you know which disclosure rule actually applies, under the EU AI Act and the ASA's own test. A seventh, written, question is graded on what you'd actually tell a client. About seven minutes.
Escalating counts as right
Some cases are genuinely borderline, even in the regulator's own guidance. Guessing on those is the failure, not the honest answer.
The written answer is graded, not self-marked
Confidence that your reasoning is sound isn't evidence that it would hold up if a client's legal team asked the same question twice.
Nothing confidential is asked
Every scenario is a fictional example. It never asks about your actual clients or campaigns.
Included in the demonstration
- An overall accuracy score and rating
- Where your disclosure judgement is strongest and weakest
- Whether overconfidence shows up in your answers
- A copy you can save and circulate to your team
This assessment reflects one person's judgement, not your agency's. Circulate the link and compare results.
A demonstration, and what the deployed version does
This demonstration
Runs in your browser on what you tell it, in one short sitting. A free account lets you save your results and compare runs.
Deployed in your organisation
Connects read-only to your content workflow and client contracts, checks each piece against the labelling rules of every market it runs in, flags where a client clause and a regulator disagree, and keeps a record of what was labelled, why, and who approved it.
Already saved a result? Sign in
Rate your confidence in this decision.
Final question
Grading your answer…
Your result is ready.
Provide your details so we can save a copy of your result for future reference.
Ensign: assessment result
Round by round
All scenarios are fictional. This assessment measures disclosure judgement and does not constitute legal advice.
Scoring your run…